Justice or vendetta? Ruling comes 19 years late
Nineteen years ago, retired car dealer Owen Lynch was gunned down at his North Minneapolis home.
Glenn Greene, who was 17 at the time, pleaded guilty to pulling the trigger and remains locked up.
But the man accused of putting the gun in Greene's hand and driving him to Lynch's house, Patrick Carline, was acquitted of first-degree murder in a later trial, a verdict that hasn't gotten any easier for Lynch's oldest son to reconcile.
"You think after time things don't bother you? It doesn't go away," Mark Lynch, the oldest of Lynch's 12 children, said this week.
A year ago, Mark Lynch, now 64, filed a civil lawsuit in Hennepin County District Court against Carline for his father's death. The standard of proof in a civil case is lower than the criminal requirement of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
In late August, a jury determined that a "preponderance of evidence" showed that Carline "willfully and wrongfully" caused Owen Lynch's death on Sept. 8, 1989. The jury awarded the Lynch family survivors $300,000 in compensatory damages.
But District Court Judge John McShane reversed a decision he had made earlier in the trial and declined to let the jury consider punitive damages against Carline, who maintains he had nothing to do with the killing.
The Lynch family attorney in the case, Richard Malacko, will ask McShane to reconsider today. If McShane rules against them again, Mark Lynch said he intends to ask the state Court of Appeals for a new trial so a jury can consider punitive damages.
A civil lawsuit after a criminal acquittal is unusual, despite similar high-profile cases such as those involving O.J. Simpson and actor Robert Blake. Most murder defendants are indigent, so there is little point in pursuing a case for monetary reward.
But Mark Lynch said he needed to do something. "To get some money is great, but to get it on the public record is important," he said.